Lenovo 80E3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80E3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5B2
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150228
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 09 '17 at 16:25
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 36.5
2-Core 68.1
36% 54.5 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 131
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Legend(17AA 3804) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.4% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 5.19
Parallax 3.72
2% 3.9 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 3.83
3% 3.15 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.4%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT09L6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 475
Write 259
Mixed 341
79% 358 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 12
65% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 59.9
DQ Mixed 6.03
15% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170MN68F9F1600 Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.7% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80E3 Builds (Compare 433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback