Toshiba SATELLITE C70D-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C70D-A  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Larne
Memory5.7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130531
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateApr 28 '21 at 07:09
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Memory 12.5
1-Core 28.7
2-Core 46.3
16% 29.2 Pts
4-Core 66.7
8-Core 83.8
10% 75.2 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
Toshiba(1179 FA85) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.352.1004.1007
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 2.7
2% 2.83 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.4
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 480GB SSD 480GB
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1230A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 139 142 90 87 25 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.1% Below average
Read 245
Write 218
Mixed 205
SusWrite 105
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 13.8
49% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 49.2
65% 116 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 101%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
6GB free, PID 0745
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8.2 8.6 8.5 7 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 6.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 8.1
11% 9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 10GB
1334, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.4
17% 6 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.8
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 381
10% 381 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C70D-A Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C70D-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback