Asus N56VV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus N56VV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N56VV
Memory5.5 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130605
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 22 '19 at 11:24
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
65% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 125
62% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 448
43% 354 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 1477) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3308
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 8.81
Parallax 2.88
4% 5.31 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 8
5% 5.25 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 256 204 199 201 176 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
61% Good
Read 132
Write 371
Mixed 305
SusWrite 219
59% 257 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 25.1
86% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 67.5
130% 260 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61%
Great: 111%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
133GB free
Firmware: 0706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 73 74 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 86
Write 58.7
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 74.3
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 12.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 13.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N56VV Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N56VV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $532
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback