Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory32.7 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '21 at 10:36
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 188
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 757
67% 568 Pts
64-Core 1,968
122% 1,968 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1200
Nvidia(10DE 1140) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 16.5
13% 16 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 13.6
13% 16.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS100T2B0A 1TB
866GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 204%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
358GB free
Firmware: MS2OA810
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 105 106 106 117 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 138
Write 112
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 111
69% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 107%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
553GB free
Firmware: JP4OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 126 124 124 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 121
Write 118
Mixed 59
SusWrite 124
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA451R7AFR8N-TF HMA451R7AFR8N-TF 39GB
2667, 2133, 2133 MHz
32767, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 17.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 15.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback