MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MSI MS-7693
Motherboard	MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693) (all builds)
Memory	21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151221
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 30 '21 at 22:03
Run Duration	234 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 77.9 1-Core 68 2-Core 133 56% 92.9 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 383 37% 305 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85B6) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.6% Above average	Lighting 69 Reflection 72.2 Parallax 66.2 56% 69.1 fps	MRender 66.4 Gravity 69.1 Splatting 64.3 54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: X312 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 165 162 195 188 192 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 374 Write 346 Mixed 263 SusWrite 187 66% 292 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 28.4 98% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 186 145% 199 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 108%
Ocz-sabe R1000 480GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 161GB free Firmware: 1.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 325 278 328 305 329 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 360 Write 406 Mixed 275 SusWrite 302 76% 336 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 24.1 102% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 235 185% 258 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 90%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 112GB free Firmware: 0315 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 75 53 53 53 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 370 Write 306 Mixed 287 SusWrite 85.7 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 30.3 95% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 120 97% 138 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 85%
Mushkin Chronos 120GB-$70 862 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 112GB free Firmware: 502A SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 103 102 100 105 106 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.8% Average	Read 154 Write 138 Mixed 141 SusWrite 102 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 55.2 4K Mixed 25.3 88% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 146 113% 155 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 84%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 147GB free Firmware: M0C SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 324 335 263 237 240 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 276 Write 400 Mixed 324 SusWrite 274 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 26.5 96% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 239 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 231 171% 226 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 99%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB 13,327 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 135 131 134 137 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 168 Write 153 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 132 95% 131 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 0.7 296% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 102%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$90 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 250GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 101 101 99 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 101 Write 97.3 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 99.9 65% 89 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 87%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 887GB free Firmware: 0401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 25.7 Mixed 27.1 SusWrite 27.5 20% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 8,730 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 16.9 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11.3 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 84.6 47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	964x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	413x
FX-8320AMD $203Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	264x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	169x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	150x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	142x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	87x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	85x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	141x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	48x
1866 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 7,244 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $289

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397