Asus F1A55-M LX3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F1A55-M LX3  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '21 at 13:03
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3820 APU
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 84.5
46% 69.1 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 163
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
Asus(1043 84C8) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.46% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 5.1
5% 5.67 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.46%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GB0160CAABV 160GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 34 30 30 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 33.7
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 31.5
24% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A55-M LX3 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LX3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback