Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu CELSIUS_W550power-L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS_W550power-L  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3417-A2
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '21 at 14:02
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 80.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 245
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 648
68% 546 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 462.31
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
42.1% Average
Lighting 50.4
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 49.5
41% 53.2 fps
MRender 48.5
Gravity 52.7
Splatting 58.1
44% 53.1 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 411 379 248 247 247 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 388
Write 432
Mixed 344
SusWrite 303
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 36.3
124% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 309
232% 312 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.2% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 23.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 22
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS_W550power-L Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS_W550power-L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback