Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X79-UP4  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '21 at 20:41
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3970X-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 207
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 638
62% 509 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.5% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 45.1
Parallax 40
35% 42.6 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 35.3
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841N 2.5 7mm 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM03D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 135 156 159 160 159 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 399
Write 216
Mixed 251
SusWrite 145
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 30.2
104% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 147
139% 221 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 127 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 115
Write 122
Mixed 60
SusWrite 126
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 33.8
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X79-UP4 Builds (Compare 918 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 - $480

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $948
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback