Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 12 '17 at 19:05
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 164
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 239
33% 244 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 3693) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.18% Terrible
Lighting 9.13
Reflection 7.88
Parallax 8.84
7% 8.62 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 7.13
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.18%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$38
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0330AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 473
Write 247
Mixed 267
72% 329 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 15.9
87% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 29
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 13.3
31% 59.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 93%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
69GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 145
Write 143
Mixed 139
107% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.2
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9DPCCN4E-TATP 0610 9DCTCO4E-TATP 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.7% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.5
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 11
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2PV Builds (Compare 2,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $298
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback