Asus M4A87TD/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD/USB3  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '17 at 12:36
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 88.3
49% 73.4 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 244
25% 204 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Asus(1043 0356) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.3% Terrible
Lighting 7.63
Reflection 8.81
Parallax 6.06
6% 7.5 fps
MRender 8.33
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 9.57
6% 7.69 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250827AS 250GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 52.2
Mixed 54.1
41% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.27
65% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 35%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB
12GB free, PID 1f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 30
Write 29.6
Mixed 25.2
36% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.36
64% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600LLA2 Series000 1600LLA2 Series000 4GB
533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.6% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD/USB3 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback