Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD EVO  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 16:21
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 103
53% 81.6 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 243
28% 217 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Gainward(10B0 1183) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.8% Poor
Lighting 28.4
Reflection 29
Parallax 41.2
23% 32.9 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 37.2
Splatting 29.9
28% 35 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FG002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 10 14 5.8 7.5 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Read 9.7
Write 15.3
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 10.6
17% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600LLA2 Series000 1600LLA2 Series000 4GB
533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 9.9
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback