Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH77EB
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130125
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 12 '21 at 11:39
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$85
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 91
2-Core 184
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 359
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.3% Excellent
Lighting 99.7
Reflection 113
Parallax 102
81% 105 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 98.9
Splatting 101
81% 99 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 207 206 209 208 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 468
Write 443
Mixed 256
SusWrite 215
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 27.9
113% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 121
155% 279 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$17
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 151 171 163 176 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 143
Write 174
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 159
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
228% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
M0 M1 M1 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 20
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 18.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback