Asus H61M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H61M-C  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150706
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMay 15 '21 at 18:17
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 193
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 367
50% 371 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.8% Below average
Lighting 42.6
Reflection 46.5
Parallax 56
35% 48.4 fps
MRender 46
Gravity 42.6
Splatting 32.3
32% 40.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 162 105 99 149 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38% Below average
Read 214
Write 213
Mixed 202
SusWrite 134
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 12.5
57% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 87.1
DQ Mixed 34.8
43% 75.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
212GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 163 165 164 162 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 138
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 163
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
278GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 146 144 147 145 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 142
Write 114
Mixed 70
SusWrite 146
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 112%
WD My Book 1230 2TB
2TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 32.1
Mixed 24.8
30% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX316C10F/8 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 14.5
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-C Builds (Compare 770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-C - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback