Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16P7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GL63 8SE
MotherboardMSI MS-16P7  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181126
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 18 '21 at 04:13
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 237
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 661
64% 529 Pts
64-Core 685
42% 685 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 82%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 126A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 95.8
Parallax 6.5
4% 35.9 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 182 131 154 145 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 558
Write 462
Mixed 208
SusWrite 151
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 21.8
98% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 157
121% 166 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 115%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
704GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 166 170 176 178 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 147
Write 150
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 172
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.7% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 21.9
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 24
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P7 Builds (Compare 1,665 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback