Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 20 '21 at 21:11
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$104
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 58
2-Core 216
64% 117 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 601
60% 486 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.2% Average
Lighting 57.8
Reflection 58.9
Parallax 45.9
47% 54.2 fps
MRender 41.6
Gravity 52.1
Splatting 47.5
39% 47.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS510S 256GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP080PB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.9 19 4.1 42 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 385
Write 16.6
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 14.6
23% 108 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 8.5
50% 12.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 99%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$59
10GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 262
Write 191
Mixed 204
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 29.4
119% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 142
113% 157 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 84%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
41GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 240 202 198 202 193 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 424
Mixed 348
SusWrite 235
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 47.1
168% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 124%
SSD 240GB
11GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 152 133 68 76 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 434
Write 106
Mixed 309
SusWrite 138
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 17.3
70% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 184
152% 213 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 95%
Apacer AS340 240GB
35GB free
Firmware: AP612PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 316 96 101 104 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 415
Write 181
Mixed 314
SusWrite 185
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 27.8
116% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 198
171% 250 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 3,278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3 - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $817
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback