Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive340% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200722
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateMay 24 '21 at 19:58
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 689
66% 546 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 18.9
15% 18.6 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 17
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
774GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 37 37 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
340% Outstanding
Read 5,044
Write 38.7
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 37
270% 1,300 MB/s
4K Read 333
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 5.2
513% 114 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 340%
Great: 305%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
295GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 90 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 85.4
Write 89
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 89.2
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 59%
Toshiba MD04ACA50D 5TB
451GB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 94 93 93 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 198
Write 149
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 94.2
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
461% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 108%
Toshiba MD04ACA600 6TB-$250
1TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 160 162 162 159 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 164
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 160
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
322% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 112%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
160GB free
Firmware: JU00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 76 76 77 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 138
Write 121
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 76.4
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 79%
WD WD120EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB
10.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 198 198 209 198 202 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 115%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.5 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 158
Write 123
Mixed 81
SusWrite 5.4
110% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 57%
OOS3000G 3TB
1TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 73 82 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 125
Write 87.5
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 67.4
112% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 38%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB
179GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.73% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 25.9
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 0.7
34% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.73%
Great: 46%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
930GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 89 88 89 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 89.8
Write 82.3
Mixed 53
SusWrite 88.3
105% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 36.7
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 32.9
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback