Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DAP_D509DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DAP_D509DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509DAP
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '21 at 09:22
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 36.9
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 123
42% 77.2 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 200
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Asus(1043 1B6F) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.02%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 236 215 212 220 220 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 626
Write 536
Mixed 552
SusWrite 239
109% 488 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 36.1
137% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 548
DQ Write 452
DQ Mixed 483
367% 495 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 189%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.6% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 14.1
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.1
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 217
18% 217 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DAP_D509DA Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DAP_D509DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback