Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 29 '21 at 20:48
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 190
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 334
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Palit(1569 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 27
Parallax 30.2
17% 26.1 fps
MRender 33.1
Gravity 27.1
Splatting 24.4
23% 28.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 353 368 244 236 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 383
Write 334
Mixed 340
SusWrite 285
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 26.2
85% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 312
237% 319 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 99%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
14GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 90 89 90 115 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 402
Write 197
Mixed 252
SusWrite 115
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 12.1
67% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 23.7
45% 90.2 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 152 157 171 160 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 160
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 150
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 101%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
481GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 69 73 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 75.1
Write 80.5
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 71.1
95% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 60%
WD My Book 1130 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1130
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 95.4
Write 94.8
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 53.1
98% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 48%
WD My Book 1TB
328GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 24 25 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 25.4
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 23.8
34% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M1A1600C10 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.6% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 13.8
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-D3H Builds (Compare 1,664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H - $333

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $579
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback