Asrock N68C-S UCC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive8.86% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 18 '17 at 20:10
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 820
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 88.7
50% 74.4 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 175
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 309.8
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 1.47
3% 3.68 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 2.87
Splatting 5.13
4% 4.55 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD103SI 500GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.86% Terrible
Read 78.6
Write 84.9
Mixed 77.3
18% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.3
2% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 8.86%
Great: 128%
Samsung HD502HJ 1TB
219GB free
Firmware: 1AG0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 68.6
Write 51.6
Mixed 59.4
45% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.28
66% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 99%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
8GB free
Firmware: 1AA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 78.7
Write 78.8
Mixed 78.5
59% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.44
117% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 13.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback