Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68-S3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-S3 FX  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '21 at 12:19
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 840-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 74.3
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 92.3
46% 71.3 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 189
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a
ASRock(1849 03D6) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD081GJ 80GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GE10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 35 12 28 40 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 18
Write 40.3
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 28.8
23% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 42%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
30GB free
Firmware: 1AC0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 93 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 88.5
Write 51
Mixed 57
SusWrite 94
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DATEN 2GD33 L10/13 Adata AD63I1B1617EG 4GB
533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.5% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 9.2
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-S3 FX Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-S3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback