Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K/BR  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '19 at 00:58
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 69
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 196
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 542
58% 461 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Lighting 65.9
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 62.4
54% 66.2 fps
MRender 74.1
Gravity 64
Splatting 56.8
52% 65 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 130 130 172 188 128 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.5% Below average
Read 230
Write 90.2
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 162
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 10.7
45% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 15.6
DQ Write 17
DQ Mixed 15.8
12% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 85%
Maxtor STM3160215AS 160GB
29GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 33 46 49 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 55.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 44.1
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 41%
Samsung HD081GJ 80GB
41GB free
Firmware: GE100-07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 74 74 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 73.3
Write 73.5
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 73.8
49% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 C14 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K/BR Builds (Compare 958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback