Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K/BR  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '19 at 17:36
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 68.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 194
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 505
55% 438 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52% Above average
Lighting 64.6
Reflection 69
Parallax 62
53% 65.2 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 62.1
Splatting 55.1
51% 63.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 125 133 132 23 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
58% Above average
Read 366
Write 122
Mixed 163
SusWrite 107
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 23.2
104% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 92.6
78% 114 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58%
Great: 85%
Maxtor STM3160215AS 160GB
61GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 44 36 42 47 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 61.5
Write 11
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 42.3
28% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 41%
Samsung HD081GJ 80GB
21GB free
Firmware: GE100-07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 68 68 65 51 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 72.3
Write 71.8
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 65
46% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 C14 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.8% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K/BR Builds (Compare 958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback