Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1610-$37 5,236 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G1610 @ 2.60GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 40.9 2-Core 113 43% 72.6 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 112 14% 108 Pts	64-Core 131 8% 131 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670 32,193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(174B E194) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	6.51% Terrible	Lighting 7.93 Reflection 8.46 Parallax 6.84 6% 7.75 fps	MRender 9.05 Gravity 6.17 Splatting 8.78 7% 8 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.51% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Richdisk device 512GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 233GB free Firmware: 1010 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.12% Terrible	Read 38.8 Write 54.7 Mixed 50.2 11% 47.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.13 4K Write 4.57 4K Mixed 1.87 11% 3.52 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.12% Great: 14%
Richdisk device 32GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1010 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 38%
Richdisk device 1TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 4GB free Firmware: 1010 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 89.7 Write 74.6 Mixed 81.5 62% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.02 4K Write 3.87 4K Mixed 2.49 475% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 1x4GB-$23 2,246 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 7.5 23% 8.17 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 6.2 14% 4.87 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	138x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	39x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	38x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87