Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-1775

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GS70 6QE
MotherboardMSI MS-1775  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '21 at 22:08
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 46%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 148
54% 94.9 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 428
41% 340 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
MSI(1462 1164) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.99% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 44.5
Parallax 4.6
2% 17.4 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.99%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVPV128HDGM-00000 128GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 267 289 260 261 269 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 1,302
Write 512
Mixed 508
SusWrite 282
143% 651 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 28.2
102% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 58
DQ Mixed 119
158% 308 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 119%
Great: 214%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
70.3% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 23.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 22.7
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1775 Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1775

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback