Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$132 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 66.1 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 176 64% 113 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 384 50% 377 Pts	64-Core 547 34% 547 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.63 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 4.4 3% 4.23 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS120G2G0A- 120GB 5,294 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 21 0.7 1 29 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 222 Write 125 Mixed 79.8 SusWrite 28.8 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 8.2 1,274% 6.47 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 153%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB 388 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 7.5 26% 9.03 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 4.3 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	999x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	337x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	227x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples	53x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	40x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples	27x

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $142