HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-db0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84AC
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201214
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJun 12 '21 at 18:57
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Memory 38.9
1-Core 52.1
2-Core 81.7
34% 57.6 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 55.6
12% 79.8 Pts
64-Core 68
4% 68 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 84AC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 5.7
3% 5 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 5.9
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
776GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 101 88 88 99 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 128
Write 107
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 95.4
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.4
176% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:0x0205 PSD48G266681S Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.6% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-db0xxx Builds (Compare 1,044 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback