PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Biostar H61MGC (all builds) |
Memory | 9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120119 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Jun 14 '21 at 10:36 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | PHL-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
62.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SSD 120GB 120GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0831B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 158 188 12 14 28 MB/s
|
25.3%
Poor
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
182GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 130 131 140 134 135 MB/s
|
78%
Very good
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
396GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 69 75 78 75 73 MB/s
|
44.2%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 M378B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 17x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 8x |
Core i7-3770SIntel $95Bench 69%, 10,699 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 18x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 11% - Very poor | Total price: $100 |