Asus A68HM-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-K  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '21 at 08:17
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 88.9
47% 74 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 105
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 32.5
19% 27.2 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 25.7
24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD N28 240GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0519A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 332 351 367 369 367 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 432
Write 340
Mixed 341
SusWrite 338
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 21.8
111% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 79
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 38.3
56% 100 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
441GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 105 106 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 103
Write 99.8
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 106
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX318C10F/4 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.3% Poor
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 8.8
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 11.7
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-K Builds (Compare 643 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback