Lenovo 30BA00HBUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30BA00HBUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1037
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '21 at 19:43
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4210R
CPU0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 70
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 190
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 723
65% 550 Pts
64-Core 2,435
151% 2,435 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620
Nvidia(10DE 1264) 2GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.56
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 20.2
18% 23.3 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 22
18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,415
Write 1,332
Mixed 1,023
280% 1,257 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 35.2
124% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 556
DQ Write 756
DQ Mixed 633
485% 648 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 380%
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: 4M2QEXF7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1975
Write 1862
Mixed 1,588
403% 1,808 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 57.8
201% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 789
DQ Write 606
DQ Mixed 729
536% 708 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 380%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 372
Mixed 42.8
151% 208 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.3
353% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 161%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7DJR8N-WM 2x16GB
2 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.8% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 8.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30BA00HBUS Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Lenovo 30BA00HBUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback