Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics82.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST X99-k9
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 17:34
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 176
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 624
56% 472 Pts
64-Core 1,018
63% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.4% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 118
Parallax 105
84% 109 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 104
Splatting 88.4
79% 97.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23
28GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 64 52 7.4 50 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 457
Write 360
Mixed 12.6
SusWrite 91.8
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 4.9
59% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 105 161 169 166 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 138
Mixed 79
SusWrite 154
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 113%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.8 2.2 4.1 3.9 4.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
2.53% Terrible
Read 9.2
Write 1.2
Mixed 3
SusWrite 3.3
4% 4.17 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.53%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FG 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
MC Read 47.2
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 36.5
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 18.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 1R 7G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 12% 84 329 253 30 36.1" 1280 720 RTK0001 Telefunken
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback