Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics95.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory19.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 25 '21 at 01:38
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$449
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 95
2-Core 172
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 772
73% 608 Pts
64-Core 1,502
93% 1,502 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.6% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 134
Parallax 113
98% 122 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 118
Splatting 111
92% 112 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 416 412 409 415 414 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 397
Write 410
Mixed 387
SusWrite 410
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 38.2
137% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 206
180% 265 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 102%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 239 241 241 233 223 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.2% Poor
Read 200
Write 199
Mixed 95.4
SusWrite 234
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 1.2
9% 4.37 MB/s
DQ Read 4.3
DQ Write 5.3
DQ Mixed 6.8
5% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 125%
Jmicron Tech 14TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 177 179 185 182 184 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Expansion 4TB
924GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 92 92 92 90 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 64.5
Write 89.7
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 90
59% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.5
169% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2400 C17 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 54.8
MC Write 53.6
MC Mixed 45.5
147% 51.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 19.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 127%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 4 1 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ8024 BenQ LCD
Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback