HP Z230 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z230 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1905
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 16:02
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3-$203
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 69.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 198
69% 124 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 567
58% 468 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
HP(103C 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.53 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 256GB-$100
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 359 380 360 349 413 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 427
Write 358
Mixed 219
SusWrite 365
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 27.4
111% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 124
130% 218 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
466GB free
Firmware: HP63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 126 127 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 120
Write 58.4
Mixed 67
SusWrite 128
69% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
407GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 135 138 142 140 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 129
Write 110
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 139
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G HX316C10F/8 KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19.4
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 5 2 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN3468 HP E243
Typical Z230 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 2,779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z230 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback