Today's hottest deals

Samsung 275E4E/275E5E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 275E4E/275E5E  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP275E4V-K01TH
Memory0.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130805
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 27 '21 at 10:47
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 17.4
2-Core 33.1
29% 38.4 Pts
4-Core 34.6
8-Core 32.4
5% 33.5 Pts
64-Core 35.6
2% 35.6 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
Sanyo(144D C680) 384MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.88% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.23 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.88%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 120GB 120GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0213E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 80 76 57 93 118 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.7% Very poor
Read 275
Write 86.2
Mixed 102
SusWrite 86.1
30% 137 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 3.5
11% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773EB0-CK0 Kingston 9905469-105.A00LF 6GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.05% Terrible
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.63 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 0.8
3% 1.07 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 275E4E/275E5E Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 275E4E/275E5E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback