Today's hottest deals

Samsung 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.02%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive12.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP355E5C-A01AU
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20120824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 06:25
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.02% Terrible
Memory 14
1-Core 9.3
2-Core 11.7
8% 11.7 Pts
4-Core 12.6
8-Core 13.5
2% 13.1 Pts
64-Core 12
1% 12 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.02%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
Sanyo(144D C0DB) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
0.42% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1
0% 0.87 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.42%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hynix HFS120G32MNM 120GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 504ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 75 77 74 85 67 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.6% Very poor
Read 130
Write 85.7
Mixed 101
SusWrite 76.5
22% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.3
9% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
4.29% Terrible
MC Read 1.2
MC Write 1.2
MC Mixed 1.7
4% 1.37 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 0.8
SC Mixed 0.9
2% 0.83 GB/s
Latency 368
11% 368 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback