Today's hottest deals

Asus G750JS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemAsus G750JS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JS
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '22 at 16:22
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 183
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 493
52% 414 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 870M
Asus(1043 157D) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 32.2
21% 26.9 fps
MRender 29.6
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 23.2
23% 28.2 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 265 288 288 290 277 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 450
Mixed 402
SusWrite 302
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 50
184% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 0.9
16% 35 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST750LM000-1EJ16G 750GB
698GB free
Firmware: AS11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 113 111 112 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 90.9
Write 18.6
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 112
45% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 2.7
466% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.1
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JS Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback