Today's hottest deals

Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180115
Uptime18.9 Days
Run DateJun 29 '21 at 02:45
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 742
73% 598 Pts
64-Core 1,123
70% 1,123 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 188
Parallax 178
139% 179 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 177
Splatting 126
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$200
835GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 980 1612 1703 1105 1092 1058 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 2,031
Write 1,598
Mixed 805
SusWrite 1,258
318% 1,423 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 61.4
217% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 848
DQ Write 672
DQ Mixed 749
564% 756 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 259%
Great: 302%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$147
202GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 419 443 439 455 441 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 449
Mixed 405
SusWrite 415
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 46.7
144% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 289
238% 341 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$147
14GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 490
Write 428
Mixed 401
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 47.5
154% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 289
238% 341 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
816GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 189 190 189 185 190 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 341
Write 342
Mixed 309
SusWrite 188
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 45
148% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 219
164% 219 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 133%
Crucial_CT2050MX300SSD1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M0CR050
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 187 188 186 183 184 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 125
Write 352
Mixed 298
SusWrite 186
55% 240 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 34.9
109% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 219
156% 199 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 99%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 273 275 273 268 272 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 397
Write 406
Mixed 341
SusWrite 272
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 29.4
97% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 118
89% 119 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 97%
SABRENT 750GB
680GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 146 147 147 143 146 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.5% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 25.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 23.3
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 34.1" 1280 720 DELA0A7 DELL U3415W
Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback