Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP540U3C-A01AE
Memory	2.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131025
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '21 at 04:29
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3217U 28,188 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 46.3 1-Core 34.3 2-Core 76.6 32% 52.4 Pts	4-Core 119 8-Core 110 16% 115 Pts	64-Core 119 7% 119 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0D7) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.95% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 2.6 3% 2.63 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.95% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 274GB free (System drive) Firmware: GG2OACD0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 16 14 16 13 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 35 Write 16.7 Mixed 20.6 SusWrite 18.5 17% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 58%
MBIL SSM Moser Baer Disk 8GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 0081 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 2.4 3 2.4 3 1.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	2.3% Terrible	Read 7.5 Write 2.2 Mixed 7.2 SusWrite 2.3 6% 4.8 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.3% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Micron 4KTF25664HZ-1G6E1 6GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 12.9 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 10.1 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 8: 1R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
8%	5%	88	14	5	60	13.2"	1366 768	SEC0200

History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 8: 1R 0G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

CPU
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	95x
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	38x
Core i7-3517UIntelBench 51%, 8,454 samples	32x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	167x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	16x
GeForce GT620MNvidiaBench 3%, 886 samples	5x

SSD
i100 24GBSandiskBench 28%, 942 samples	20x
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 29%, 808 samples	39x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F BA92-09550A 6GBElpidaBench 41%, 139 samples	11x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GBElpidaBench 49%, 276 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16