Asrock 990FX Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '21 at 09:34
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 121
60% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 406
40% 327 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 23.4
20% 22.7 fps
MRender 27.5
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 18.9
19% 24.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 296 141 133 131 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 424
Write 309
Mixed 329
SusWrite 191
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 24.6
84% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 41
DQ Mixed 66.6
58% 90.4 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 134%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
458GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 314 375 373 359 373 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 375
Write 377
Mixed 281
SusWrite 352
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 27
89% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 89.6
DQ Mixed 94.2
71% 95.6 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
444GB free
Firmware: KC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 96 97 96 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 90.1
Write 93
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 96.5
62% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 88%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 113 116 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 122
Write 114
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 112
125% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 60%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 113 116 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 206
Write 173
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 112
182% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 19.1
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 13.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 23" 1280 701 PHLC066 Philips 234CL
Typical 990FX Extreme6 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback