Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JA
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '21 at 07:58
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 242
72% 134 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 306
42% 310 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1052) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 7
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 6.8
6% 7.03 fps
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM128GDJTNG-831 128GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 183 185 186 186 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 1,084
Write 357
Mixed 398
SusWrite 192
111% 508 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 42.8
197% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 233
194% 276 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 127%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.7% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 23.8
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 23.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0903
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback