Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory49.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160829
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateJul 04 '21 at 05:16
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 84.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 197
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 835
74% 629 Pts
64-Core 1,139
70% 1,139 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 184
Parallax 171
131% 172 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 167
Splatting 120
112% 139 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
6GB free
Firmware: MU03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 396
Write 131
Mixed 196
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 31
113% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 108
102% 163 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 77%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 766 719 696 683 661 672 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 2,166
Write 931
Mixed 745
SusWrite 699
250% 1,135 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 53.3
182% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 857
DQ Write 480
DQ Mixed 660
493% 666 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 216%
Great: 353%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
307GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 138 133 134 129 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 124
Write 102
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 135
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 105%
WD %s,t FILEIO 6TB
938GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 20 24 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 18% Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 49.5
MC Write 51.7
MC Mixed 45.2
139% 48.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 19.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 122%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 2R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 6% 62 205 14 60 23.5" 1920 1080 SAM08D8 S24B350
History: Score 12: 0R 3G 3B | Score 14: 2R 1G 1B
Typical GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback