Lenovo 82JQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82JQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '21 at 15:12
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 81.3
1-Core 152
2-Core 298
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 981
89% 748 Pts
64-Core 1,410
87% 1,410 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3A80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 129
Parallax 131
109% 131 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 104
Splatting 87.3
88% 112 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00-1101 1TB
673GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1756 1626 1642 1153 1074 718 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 1,968
Write 2,150
Mixed 1,799
SusWrite 1328
408% 1,811 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 67.8
229% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,142
DQ Write 795
DQ Mixed 995
736% 977 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 274%
Great: 308%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
159GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1022 84 100 100 105 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,474
Write 1483
Mixed 1,084
SusWrite 252
240% 1,073 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 73.2
249% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 950
DQ Mixed 273
358% 635 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 188%
Great: 295%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00WN9B0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 70 69 69 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 133
Write 138
Mixed 99
SusWrite 70.3
146% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 53%
Hitachi HDP725040GLA360 400GB
200GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 70 69 70 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 50.2
Write 73.5
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 70.4
82% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 29%
M4-CT512 M4SSD2 512GB
457GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 237 239 242 241 241 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 378
Write 247
Mixed 258
SusWrite 241
362% 281 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 17.5
1,534% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 16.3
DQ Write 28.1
DQ Mixed 18.2
1,635% 20.9 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 191%
Great: 312%
TOSHIBA EXT 1TB
782GB free, PID 0d00
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 99 96 94 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 98.6
Write 99.2
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 96.9
110% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C20 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 34.7
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 44.8
SC Mixed 32.4
99% 34.6 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 4R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 32% 34 4 2 165 16" 1834 1146 CSO1600
History: Score 32: 3R 4G 5B | Score 33: 4R 3G 4B
Typical 82JQ Builds (Compare 3,697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

System: Lenovo 82JQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback