Samsung RF712

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung RF712  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RF712
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110817
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJan 09 '18 at 13:58
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 73.2
55% 79.4 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 247
36% 262 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6630M
Sanyo(144D C0AC) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 6.46
Parallax 5.38
5% 6.13 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 4.83
Splatting 5.52
4% 5.31 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HN-M750MBB 750GB-$58
512GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 88.8
Write 84.6
Mixed 81.2
64% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.19
49% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 56%
TOSHIBA EXT 1TB
369GB free, PID 0d00
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 20.1
Mixed 23.3
30% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.19
59% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
49.9% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RF712 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RF712

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback