Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-UD3P  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '21 at 21:59
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 142
60% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 323
35% 277 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Gigabyte(1458 3515) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 19.5
17% 22.6 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 19.9
19% 23.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 470 Series SSD 64GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM09B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 169 165 147 127 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 257
Write 146
Mixed 162
SusWrite 146
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 16.7
68% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 35.2
DQ Mixed 20.5
30% 59 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 43%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
652GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 124 127 126 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 126
Write 106
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 126
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.3
232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial ST102464BA160 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 21
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-UD3P Builds (Compare 836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback