Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512DA
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 16 '21 at 16:55
Run Duration167126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Memory 36.3
1-Core 48.7
2-Core 75.7
32% 53.6 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 204
23% 180 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Asus(1043 1821) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.45.44
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.92% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 1.5
0% 1.7 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.92%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1102 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 109 110 109 111 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
47% Average
Read 373
Write 143
Mixed 182
SusWrite 113
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 18.2
62% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 132
100% 135 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB
2400, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.2% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 12.8
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 3R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 17% 52 2 1 60 15.5" 1536 864 CMN15F5
History: Score 28: 2R 4G 6B | Score 25: 3R 2G 4B
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA Builds (Compare 337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback