Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '21 at 18:37
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 82%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 149
57% 97.4 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 582
52% 441 Pts
64-Core 840
52% 840 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1281 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 58.2
Parallax 79
49% 65.7 fps
MRender 58.2
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 43.3
43% 54.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0807A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 30 62 34 54 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 457
Write 327
Mixed 27
SusWrite 49.9
47% 215 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 0.4
49% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 88.9
DQ Mixed 49.8
53% 89.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
790GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 132 148 157 155 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 180
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 150
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7EH64AA#ABB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 34.1
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 4 2 60 21.5" 1280 720 VSC6F2E VA2246 SERIES
Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,928 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback