Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 20 '21 at 22:12
Run Duration608 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$146
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 67.5
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
90% 172 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 995
92% 767 Pts
64-Core 1442
89% 1442 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 80.3
Parallax 133
102% 113 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 120
Splatting 110
110% 138 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$110
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1124 692 694 684 685 675 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 2000
Write 2,141
Mixed 1,674
SusWrite 759
369% 1,644 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 69
226% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,158
DQ Write 797
DQ Mixed 960
721% 972 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 240%
Great: 297%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
465GB free
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 438 438 437 438 437 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 381
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 438
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 49
152% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 182
142% 194 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 101%
Great: 125%
Hitachi HDS5C4040ALE630 4TB
153GB free
Firmware: MPAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 67 67 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 111
Write 118
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 65
59% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 73%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$55
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 111 114 110 111 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62% Good
Read 105
Write 78.1
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 111
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HDN728080ALE604 8TB
744GB free
Firmware: A4GNW91X
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 194 200 200 198 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 196
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 199
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.7
205% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Hitachi HDN728080ALE604 8TB
130GB free
Firmware: A4GNW91X
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 189 200 192 135 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 207
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 172
121% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.7
232% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 178 179 179 176 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 142
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 178
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 97%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 176 165 189 187 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 182
Write 191
Mixed 130
SusWrite 180
231% 170 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 98%
TRUSTED Mass Storage 17.5TB
10.5TB free, PID 4d10
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 19.2
Mixed 0.2
6% 9.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 20%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 152 154 152 153 151 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 140
Write 85.2
Mixed 110
SusWrite 149
162% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 61%
WDC WD40 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 4TB
844GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.1 8.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 160
Write 158
Mixed 113
SusWrite 1.4
136% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.3
161% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 63%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
730GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 151 154 153 153 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
64% Good
Read 152
Write 151
Mixed 120
SusWrite 152
195% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
140% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 64%
Great: 68%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
254GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.1 8.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 64.5
Write 91.7
Mixed 112
SusWrite 1.4
93% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.6
212% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$110
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 26.3
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 5R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 10% 89 334 268 60 31.5" 1920 1080 SAM0D34 C32F391
History: Score 5: 1R 0G 0B | Score 6: 0R 0G 6B | Score 31: 5R 1G 3B
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $876
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback