Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive446% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 19:37
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 78.5
1-Core 167
2-Core 332
102% 192 Pts
4-Core 659
8-Core 1146
109% 902 Pts
64-Core 1,626
101% 1,626 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 101%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 194
Parallax 185
144% 186 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 186
Splatting 127
121% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
139GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 290 290 291 290 291 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 456
Mixed 409
SusWrite 309
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 58.6
194% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 199
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$128
98GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,376
Write 1523
Mixed 872
349% 1,590 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 73.5
256% 94.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,318
DQ Write 1,214
DQ Mixed 1,126
883% 1,220 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3333 3335 3333 2398 1735 1718 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
446% Outstanding
Read 2,834
Write 3,334
Mixed 3,042
SusWrite 2642
670% 2,963 MB/s
4K Read 79.7
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 111
357% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,392
DQ Write 1,279
DQ Mixed 1,337
1,003% 1,336 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 446%
Great: 477%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
82GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 92 98 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 93.1
Write 93.9
Mixed 32
SusWrite 97.7
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 88%
JetFlash Transcend 64GB
52GB free, PID 1000, Transcent Jetflash 780 64GB
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 86 86 87 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.7% Good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.3
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 27
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 27" 1280 720 ACR0405 Acer XB270H
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $499

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,627
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback