Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 24 '21 at 22:00
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 76
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 125
56% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 399
39% 321 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 462.59
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 112
Parallax 104
86% 107 fps
MRender 97.4
Gravity 104
Splatting 101
82% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 295 318 357 356 378 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 391
Write 396
Mixed 296
SusWrite 336
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 25
82% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 93.3
DQ Mixed 132
95% 125 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 150 145 149 150 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 149
Write 144
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 146
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.3
137% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 172 178 180 177 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 176
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 176
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
485GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 104 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 101
Write 95.7
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 103
74% 99 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1600 CL9-9-9 D3-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 16.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 24 0" 1280 720 DON0045 DENON-AVR
Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback