Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_TUF516PE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_TUF516PE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PE
Memory17.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '21 at 08:11
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 74.2
1-Core 137
2-Core 327
93% 179 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 714
80% 626 Pts
64-Core 721
45% 721 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Asus(1043 13DC) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7141
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.5% Below average
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 52.1
24% 37.4 fps
MRender 60.3
Gravity 47.5
Splatting 48.8
42% 52.2 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1209 1182 1200 730 317 195 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,295
Write 1,215
Mixed 1,134
SusWrite 806
250% 1,112 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 65.4
220% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,112
DQ Write 420
DQ Mixed 926
643% 819 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 204%
Great: 253%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
359GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1628 1638 1521 1288 1281 1315 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,057
Write 1,588
Mixed 1440
SusWrite 1,445
366% 1,633 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 76.5
260% 90.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,159
DQ Write 449
DQ Mixed 966
672% 858 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 287%
Great: 421%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-16GRS 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 23.1
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 19.1
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_TUF516PE Builds (Compare 793 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_TUF516PE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback