Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateJul 30 '21 at 14:42
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 238
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 761
74% 610 Pts
64-Core 975
60% 975 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 144
Parallax 132
107% 136 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 137
Splatting 120
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$150
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 533 493 479 481 469 470 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,821
Write 808
Mixed 602
SusWrite 487
204% 930 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 43.3
154% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 338
242% 314 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 164%
Great: 243%
Transcend TS1TSSD370S 1TB
214GB free
Firmware: O0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 410 407 410 412 412 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 404
Mixed 299
SusWrite 410
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 31.5
111% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 194
170% 251 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 110%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
65GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,834
Write 4,922
Mixed 4,755
1,082% 4,837 MB/s
4K Read 184
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 137
524% 151 MB/s
DQ Read 434
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 369
278% 374 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$75
1TB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 105 105 106 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 105
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 65%
ST6000VN 0041-2EL11C 6TB
612GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.3 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 149
Write 161
Mixed 99.9
SusWrite 1.3
130% 103 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 95%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
239GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 64 83 79 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 87.4
Write 79.4
Mixed 73
SusWrite 77.6
107% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 48%
C300-CTF DDAC128MAG 128GB
81GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 75 66 80 80 88 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
192% Outstanding
Read 286
Write 138
Mixed 179
SusWrite 77.8
206% 170 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 10.8
1,862% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 61.1
DQ Mixed 11.6
2,558% 31.9 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB-$140
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 48
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 48.4
134% 46.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 25.4
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 120%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 2R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 21% 33 109 6 60 27.9" 2560 1440 ACI28A7 ASUS MG28U
Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback